Google sells out
By Jay Ambrose
Published January 30, 2006
The Washington Times
Google sometimes seems like half my life. I start my days looking at Google News on the Internet, and often spend hours using the Google search engine to learn more about subjects I am going to write about. Little did I know I was dancing with the devil.
It's true. For the sake of this very rich company
getting still richer, Google has agreed to collaborate with China in subverting
the Internet's promise as an extraordinary means of liberation and in keeping
the Chinese people subjugated.
More specifically, it is reported, Google will practice Chinese-style censorship, ensuring none of the 100 million Web surfers in China can use Google to find anything by typing in such words as "democracy" or "human rights," or by trying to locate nongovernment information on such topics as Tibetan freedom, Taiwan independence, the Falun Gong religion or atrocities committed by their own officials.
For thus blocking entry to more Web sites than there probably are books in a dozen major libraries, as well as pulling the trigger on blogging and e-mail, Google gets a grin, a handshake and a have-at-it agreement from Chinese autocrats who previously tried to censor the search engine themselves.
Now Google will do financial battle in this major Internet market -- second only to the United States --with Yahoo, Microsoft and Chinese firms as it tries to stack more money on its already accumulated Everest-high pile. As columnist Thomas Lipscomb has reported, Google's stock is valued in excess of $80 billion, more than that of the entire newspaper industry.
All this means it's time to make excuses, and they have not been long in coming.
Google co-founder Sergey Brin, as quoted in a Reuters news accounts, says he "came to the conclusion that more information is better, even if it is not as full as we would like to see." No longer must Google confront "the Great Firewall" of censorship erected by Chinese officials, he said.
"France and Germany require censorship for Nazi sites," he is also quoted as observing, "and the U.S. requires censorship based on the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. These various countries also have laws on child pornography."
Yes, the best can sometimes be enemy of the good, as Mr. Brin suggests, but leaders of these high-tech companies offer China something it needs, and by standing firm, by being tough, could conceivably have bent China more toward responsible, civilized behavior as it moves ahead to superpower status.
Google -- along with Yahoo and Microsoft -- is abetting a crime against humanity while making it seem more or less OK.
The agreement to keep French and German Internet users from Nazi sites is a regrettable abridgement of free inquiry, but does not begin to compare to siding with some of the world's most devoted enemies of freedom in their iniquitous mission.
As for calling the protection of copyrighted movies and music censorship, that's blather, and to liken laws prohibiting child pornography to what the Chinese are doing is laughable.
Google's motto, as any number of news accounts and commentaries have noted, is, "Don't Be Evil." That's not exactly the world's highest standard. It's about like saying a new mother's chief obligation is not to throw her baby out a second-story window. The startling fact is Google now has done something evil, has tossed the baby out the window, and has put itself in a position of doing greater evil.
Yahoo -- which had earlier made Google-style compromises -- says it was just going along with Chinese laws when it helped identify a Chinese journalist who had written an e-mail about the Tiananmen Square revolt of 1989. For that deed, the journalist is spending 10 years in prison.
I am among those who have argued the Internet could be the most powerful instrument since the printing press in disseminating information and ideas that will empower and free people. But I left out of the calculation the need for corporate officers to cling to their integrity, no matter how much the almighty dollar tugs at them.
I haven't given up hope. I still believe in the Internet. That belief would be strengthened if Google became a respectable dancing partner by renouncing its China deal.
Jay Ambrose, former Washington editorial policy director for Scripps Howard News Service, is a nationally syndicated columnist.
Copyright © 2006 News World Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.